




|
|
Presented by Dr. Roger L. McBroom
American Seed Trade Association to the Annual Meeting of the National
Council of Commercial Plant Breeders
Washington, DC
December 20, 2004
What started out to be duty, the preparation of this paper, turned into
a pleasurable and interesting exercise. It is not often that one has an
excuse to get lost in the history and look at the evolution and pathway
taken by an organization as diverse as the National Council of Commercial
Plant Breeders. The Board minutes from the last 25 years turned out to
be extremely interesting reading, in fact, sometimes I got so involved
in the reading, I lost sight of the fact that my main goal was to finish
this article. It gave me a great sense of pride and admiration for what
this group has accomplished and made contributions to.
A very incomplete listing of projects the Council undertook or contributed
to in a substantial way include:
| |
Helped in regeneration and growout of several germplasm collections,
including the Maize Germplasm Collection. |
| |
Cosponsored "Plant Breeding Review". |
| |
Was a long term and significant supporter of "Diversity" magazine |
| |
Worked on and provided testimony on PVP amendments to strengthen
this intellectual property protection and align with UPOV Convention
in the international arena. |
| |
Served on Research Advisory Committees as well as Crop Review Boards,
PVP Advisory Board, National Genetic Resources Board, and others. |
| |
When regulation of Biotech Products became a hot topic in Congress,
sent congressmen and decision makers 750 copies of "Biotechnology
and Diversity" by Steve Witt to help generate science based discussion
of the subject. |
| |
Gave strong support, both financially and non-financially, to Germplasm
collection and preservation and helped gain support for and improvements
in the National Germplasm Collections |
| |
Contributed to variety description and identifiers used by AOSCA
for certification process. |
| |
Made their views known about the release of Public Varieties and
on Public Variety Tests, to the improvement of both areas. |
| |
Was very involved with the Latin American Maize Project, which pulled
public and private researchers together with a common goal of improving
the genetic diversity and performance of corn germplasm. |
| |
Sponsored or co-sponsored various plant breeding symposia, throughout
its history. |
| |
Acted as a clearinghouse for variety release information, copying
and distributing notices about new varieties, breeding lines, germplasm
pools, and genetic populations to it's members. |
In 1979, Dr. Harold Loden, prepared a paper on the history of the organization
from its "stormy" start in 1954. In his paper he mentioned that the original
objectives of the NCCPB were: A) "…. Continuing development of high standards
of professional and business ethics; B) promote cooperation and mutual
assistance with publicly supported research agencies; C) recognition of
individual scientific contributions toward betterment of American Agriculture…".
During the next 25 years these core values have been reworked and restated
several times with revisions in the goals and by-laws of the organization
in 1989 and again in 2001, but the underlying meaning and purpose has
remained very much at the heart of the Council. These revisions in wordings
and additional goals and purposes, while still retaining these core values,
have allowed the Council to reach it's 50th anniversary as a strong organization.
With the passage of time, the issues and emphasis of the Council has
changed and evolved to fit the changes in technologies and international
climate that has and is shaping the world of plant breeding. The first
mention of processes involving genetic engineering came in 1981. This
same year, the Council opened up and welcomed membership from Canada and
Mexico. This represented the start of a more international view of the
world, and probably the start of the realization that what was happening
around the world would impact what its members were trying to accomplish.
The Board in place in 1981 also set up a separate committee to handle
the large number of nominees for the NCCPB Plant Breeding Award. This
revolving committee, still in place today, was able to handle the 45 nominations
received in 1985, a very daunting task I would think. Major, long term
support of "Diversity" magazine began in 1982 and only ended with the
demise of this publication in the late 1990's. Discussion of the FAO Understanding
on Plant Genetic Resources first appeared in the minutes in1985 and continues
currently. This same year saw the development and start up of the Plant
Breeding Award for Industry, with the first award being made in 1986 to
Dr. William Brown.
Another sign of changing times in this organization's history came in
1987, when the Board, for the first time, added liability insurance for
itself. The first mention of the concepts of minimum distance and essentially
derived varieties also occurred in 1987. These concepts, still being discussed
and refined today, are perfect examples of one of the strengths of the
Council. These concepts are so complex and far-reaching in their implications,
the Board had to be almost overwhelmed by the size of the task ahead of
them. Instead of being intimidated, they broke the task down into more
manageable parts, assigned committees by crop, and made sure the talents
of the membership were being utilized to reach their goals.
The running discussions of biotechnology and its impact on plant breeding
took a slightly different turn in 1993, when the focus of the discussion
became the regulation of Biotech Products. It was also in 1993, that the
Council was invited to send a guest representative to the Intellectual
Property Group of ASSINSEL, the International Plant Breeders Association.
ASSINSEL, founded in 1938, merged with the FIS (International Seed Trade
Association, founded in 1924), to form the International Seed Federation
(ISF) in May 2002. The NCCPB has become an official member of the International
Seed Federation.
In keeping with its stated purpose "to promote plant breeding, plant
genetic research, and related plant improvement disciplines as challenging
and interesting careers to help ensure a continuing supply of trained
plant scientists", the Board established a Graduate Student Award in 1995.
The first recipient was M. Lynn Senior from North Carolina State University
in 1997.
From the beginning of this twenty five history in 1979 until 1998, Robert
Falasca served the Council as Secretary-Treasurer. His attention to detail
and his gentle (or sometimes less gentle) prodding kept the ever-changing
Board on track and provided a sense of continuity. The history of the
National Council of Commercial Plant Breeders would be woefully incomplete
without mention of his name and recognition of his contributions through
the years.
In keeping with its' tradition of adopting and utilizing new technologies,
the NCCPB established its' first website presence in 1998. The current
website, www.nccpb.org, was revised, reorganized and went live in November,
2004. As part of the preparation effort, the Board concluded it was time
for an official logo and a Mission Statement. The Mission Statement is
essentially an abbreviated restatement of purposes, but is important enough
to the continued guidance and growth of our organization that I am taking
the liberty of reproducing it here.
"The mission of the National Council of Commercial Plant Breeders is
to promote, technically and ethically, the interests of professional US
plant breeders' world wide. This includes (1) the fostering of collaboration
and cooperation among all plant breeding and improvement organizations,
(2) the encouragement of public and private funding for plant breeding
research and development, (3) the support and mentoring of plant breeding
students, (4) the recognition of scientific achievement in public and
private breeding by both students and professional plant breeders and
(5) the support of effective systems of intellectual property protection
world wide."
Current Agenda Topics for the Board include: the National Plant Disease
Recovery System, UPOV Database Priorities, APHIS meeting follow-up, ASTA
Intellectual Property Paper, and a report on the Intellectual Property
Group of the International Seed Federation. As I look through the history
and the current topics, I see an organization that is still very viable,
still growing, still adapting, and still committed to doing all it can
to improve the science and the art of plant breeding. I see the National
Council of Plant Breeders as the organization best able to address and
speak for commercial plant breeders when national or international issues
develop, in the past, now, and into the future.
|
|
|